Komentowana treść: OWB 1.9
18.08.2010 19:21
[#5]
Re: OWB 1.9
@G. Kraszewski, post #4
Właśnie mam na myśli tą obok paska, miałem zainstalowaną taką co złe kodowanie dawała i strona docelowa głupiała. Ale w tym przypadku faktycznie może brak obsługi stron kodowych w OWB.
A jakbyś wygenerował inny kod wyszukiwarki z innym kodowaniem? http://tinyurl.com/yxzw94 i potestuj na PPA czy Google.
A jakbyś wygenerował inny kod wyszukiwarki z innym kodowaniem? http://tinyurl.com/yxzw94 i potestuj na PPA czy Google.
18.08.2010 23:57
[#10]
Re: OWB 1.9
Wreszcie działają demotywatory.pl ! :D
Na 1.8 się wieszało na starcie, musiałem odpalać sputnika.
Na 1.8 się wieszało na starcie, musiałem odpalać sputnika.
19.08.2010 05:59
[#13]
Re: OWB 1.9
Niestety Gmail jest nadal nieużywalny - działa za pierwszym zalogowaniem, kolejne uruchomienie przeglądarki wymaga ręcznego skasowania cookies domeny google.com żeby nie mieć na żółtym pasku (gmaila) na górze "Ups.. system napotkał problem (#500)"... Po wejściu do jakiejkolwiek wiadomości nie można już nic z nią zrobić (skasować, archiwizować, etc.).
19.08.2010 18:24
[#17]
Re: OWB 1.9
A umnie nadal wywala się na wystawieniu ogłoszenia na craiglist.
Czasami wywala mi się nadal na zapłaceniu za aukcję eBay poprzez PayPal...
Czasami wywala mi się nadal na zapłaceniu za aukcję eBay poprzez PayPal...
20.08.2010 04:34
[#21]
Re: OWB 1.9
@ZED^lM, post #20
Let's answer, even if reports aren't sent directly to me but to a forum that i'm not really supposed to understand at all. :)
@13
gmail works just fine here, even after reading several mails. If there's a bug, it's surely more complex than that to reproduce. Newer cookie implementation has to be enabled for gmail to work properly, and if your database was corrupted at some point, it must be deleted.
@17
I can't say about craiglist that i don't use, but i've no issue at all with paypal or ebay. You might be a victim of some webcore bug related to threading. You can always disable prefs->network->network thread and see if it makes any difference. But such random crashes always make me suspect memory though.
A debug log would of course help for this kind of issue.
@20
I created an o2.pl account, and it works just fine. Make sure you use the newer cookie implementation in prefs->network (enabled by default, anyway). If it's already enabled, maybe your cookie database (conf/cookiedatabase.db) got corrupted somehow (crash, reboot during write, ...). Also to be noted the cookie database format *did* change slightly between 1.7 and 1.8 (as stated in the readme), so if the database was not flushed at that point, it might be inconsistent. The format didn't change between 1.8 and 1.9 though.
@13
gmail works just fine here, even after reading several mails. If there's a bug, it's surely more complex than that to reproduce. Newer cookie implementation has to be enabled for gmail to work properly, and if your database was corrupted at some point, it must be deleted.
@17
I can't say about craiglist that i don't use, but i've no issue at all with paypal or ebay. You might be a victim of some webcore bug related to threading. You can always disable prefs->network->network thread and see if it makes any difference. But such random crashes always make me suspect memory though.
A debug log would of course help for this kind of issue.
@20
I created an o2.pl account, and it works just fine. Make sure you use the newer cookie implementation in prefs->network (enabled by default, anyway). If it's already enabled, maybe your cookie database (conf/cookiedatabase.db) got corrupted somehow (crash, reboot during write, ...). Also to be noted the cookie database format *did* change slightly between 1.7 and 1.8 (as stated in the readme), so if the database was not flushed at that point, it might be inconsistent. The format didn't change between 1.8 and 1.9 though.
20.08.2010 10:20
[#22]
Re: OWB 1.9
@Fab1, post #21
Thanks for your reply. Some guys just don't send their reports using "I don't know the language" excuse. You've just proven that they're just lazy/shy (unless you know Polish, which I doubt).
What about bug reported by Krashan in post #4? That's really annoying (before you start calling me lazy/shy too - I was going to send you that report together with a small fix for a horizontal scrollbar theme).
What about bug reported by Krashan in post #4? That's really annoying (before you start calling me lazy/shy too - I was going to send you that report together with a small fix for a horizontal scrollbar theme).
21.08.2010 16:39
[#28]
Re: OWB 1.9
@pampers, post #27
Jest jeszcze pewien szczegół w licencji, który uniemożliwia wykorzystanie kodu Faba w innych projektach niż kompletny port OWB z MorphOS-a...
To chyba oznacza, że ciężko byłoby ten kod połączyć z jakimkolwiek innym. Czyli np. praca Stanisława Szymczyka włożona w port dla AROS-a poszłaby w błoto. To trochę bez sensu, bo AROS-owi wystarczyłyby fragmenty kodu...
Jeśli chodzi o port dla Windows to już zupełnie nie da się tej wersji przenieść w całości :(
Dziwne, że taki port dotąd nie powstał...
Mam na myśli port przeglądarki OWB jako takiej a nie konkretnie port ze źródeł Faba oczywiście.
Ostatnia edycja: 21.08.10 16:59:11
To chyba oznacza, że ciężko byłoby ten kod połączyć z jakimkolwiek innym. Czyli np. praca Stanisława Szymczyka włożona w port dla AROS-a poszłaby w błoto. To trochę bez sensu, bo AROS-owi wystarczyłyby fragmenty kodu...
Jeśli chodzi o port dla Windows to już zupełnie nie da się tej wersji przenieść w całości :(
Dziwne, że taki port dotąd nie powstał...
Mam na myśli port przeglądarki OWB jako takiej a nie konkretnie port ze źródeł Faba oczywiście.
Ostatnia edycja: 21.08.10 16:59:11
21.08.2010 17:19
[#29]
Re: OWB 1.9
@FOrest, post #28
@28
Sorry for the english again. :)
In fact, the condition only applies to the added MorphOS files, which mostly consist in MUI classes. And these classes wouldn't fit at all in AROS OWB current design. So it's really better to port the whole thing than to tear MorphOS sources apart and to integrat random bits in AROS port. So i added this condition to avoid that kind of hacky attempts (but i'm not naive, i know some could easily circumvent this condition anyway :)).
Of course, AROS/OS4 is free to reuse some of the changes I made in generic parts (for instance network layer, cookies, ...).
But you won't get that much if you don't port the whole thing, anyway.
Sorry for the english again. :)
In fact, the condition only applies to the added MorphOS files, which mostly consist in MUI classes. And these classes wouldn't fit at all in AROS OWB current design. So it's really better to port the whole thing than to tear MorphOS sources apart and to integrat random bits in AROS port. So i added this condition to avoid that kind of hacky attempts (but i'm not naive, i know some could easily circumvent this condition anyway :)).
Of course, AROS/OS4 is free to reuse some of the changes I made in generic parts (for instance network layer, cookies, ...).
But you won't get that much if you don't port the whole thing, anyway.
