@snajper,
post #32
powiedział, czy nie powiedział, jakie to ma znaczenie?
znaczenie ma to, że tak zrobił i to on jest za to odpowiedzialny:
Bill Gates o swojej roli w powstanie IBM PC:
"BG: Microsoft was playing a much broader role[laughs] than just doing software for this machine. I mean whether it is the keyboard, the character set, the graphics adapter, or even the memory layouts. I laid out memory so the bottom 640K was general purpose RAM and the upper 384 I reserved for video and ROM, and things like that. That is why they talk about the 640K limit. It is actually a limit, not of the software, in any way, shape, or form, it is the limit of the microprocessor. That thing generates addresses, 20-bits addresses, that only can address a megabyte of memory. And, therefore, all the applications are tied to that limit. It was ten times what we had before. But to my surprise, we ran out of that address base for applications within -- oh five or six years people were complaining."
źródło:
http://americanhistory.si.edu/collections/comphist/gates.htm
i tu jeszcze jeden rozsądny głos, facet po prostu nie wierzy zaprzeczeniom Billa Gatesa i jego wątpliwości są poparte faktami:
http://imranontech.com/2007/02/20/did-bill-gates-say-the-640k-line/
Ostatnia aktualizacja: 05.08.2012 22:00:58 przez jubi